Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 6:34 PM Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>
wrote:

> >That leads me to also wonder why don't we change \conninfo to have this
> >tabular behavior instead of creating a separate command for it. Why do
> >we need to keep the existing form of \conninfo? To me it seems strictly
> >less useful, as it is harder to read.
>
> Here, you're suggesting that it would be useful to keep the \conninfo
> meta-command, improve it with a "new version," and display the returned
> content as a table instead of text. If that's the case, I think it's a
> good idea
> since it would show the "new settings" that the current version doesn't
> display and, yes, it would serve the same purpose as \conninfo+.
>

Sure, we can proceed with that. I do hope this will be the final one we try
:)

> Regarding which settings to display, the discussion tends to get very
> broad,
> and we can never settle on what should be shown definitively. I believe
> that, often, less is more, so showing only the essential settings would be
> enough.
>

In that case, we can collectively decide which parameters should be shown
in this command. My suggestion:
- application_name
- encodings (maybe?)
- role (new patch)
- is_superuser
- session_authorization
- in_hot_standby

Feel free to suggest any additions or removals.

Regards,
Hunaid Sohail