Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

From: Hunaid Sohail <hunaidpgml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+
Date: 2024-12-13 04:47:51
Message-ID: CAMWA6yYzxTL3BXrkLBXOLb2adR_3ivxXmQ_V-+z9RYj5iV3E=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I provided a patch a month ago with a new approach as suggested by David.
Unfortunately, it didn't get any attention in the November CF.

I would appreciate your feedback on whether we should proceed with this new
approach or stick with the previous one.

Regards,
Hunaid Sohail

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2024-12-13 05:04:13 Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay
Previous Message Kirill Reshke 2024-12-13 04:26:21 Re: Allow subfield references without parentheses