Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

From: Hunaid Sohail <hunaidpgml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
Cc: Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+
Date: 2024-09-10 04:32:56
Message-ID: CAMWA6yY5zdLZ9an=tqL1WAr-q3b5fO-_KPMqeQQdB4Vh-Cc6YA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I have attached a rebased patch.

Regards,
Hunaid Sohail

On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 6:22 PM Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de> wrote:

> Hi Hunaid
>
> On 02.08.24 14:11, Hunaid Sohail wrote:
> >
> > I have also edited the documentation and added it to the patch. Please
> > let me know if any changes are required.
> >
>
> I just wanted to review this patch again but v30 does not apply
>
> === Applying patches on top of PostgreSQL commit ID
> d8df7ac5c04cd17bf13bd3123dcfcaf8007c6280 ===
> /etc/rc.d/jail: WARNING: Per-jail configuration via jail_* variables is
> obsolete. Please consider migrating to /etc/jail.conf.
> === applying patch ./v30-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch
> patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
> gpatch: **** Only garbage was found in the patch input.
>
>
> I will set the status to "Waiting on Author".
>
> --
> Jim
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
v31-0001-Add-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch application/octet-stream 6.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2024-09-10 04:51:03 Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution
Previous Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2024-09-10 04:25:24 RE: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication