Re: Query taking seq scan on a table

From: Shrikant Bhende <shrikantpostgresql(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Avinash Kumar <avinash(dot)vallarapu(at)gmail(dot)com>, dbatocloud17(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query taking seq scan on a table
Date: 2020-09-20 13:48:22
Message-ID: CAMTQpJCrPLcbw6vmR2i8S6qbXVG3bLioTG7aCBm1JkBHoFtmrw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hello,

show seq_page_cost; 1

show random_page_cost; 4

storage type : SSD

Table size : 39 GB

There are no columns added, also I haven't found anything where we need to
update the data for older rows.

Thanks

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 6:55 PM Avinash Kumar <avinash(dot)vallarapu(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Sun., Sep. 20, 2020, 10:19 a.m. Shrikant Bhende, <
> shrikantpostgresql(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am facing issues with one of the queries running on* Amazon Aurora (PG
>> VERSION 9.6)* which is taking more than a minute to complete. As per the
>> initial investigation I assume that one part of the query is taking a
>> sequential scan on a table("wldbowner.member") which is consuming most of
>> the execution time. I tried to use index (Btree and GIN ) as well but none
>> of them were helping to get the query to run faster. Attached is the query
>> along with the explain analyze of the same, any help on the same would be
>> appreciated.
>>
>> NOTE : I have done the vacuum on the table already to get rid of bloat
>> issues.
>> Reindex and test with more work mem is also helping.
>>
> Just wanted to clarify one thing before looking at the query.
>
> What is random_page_cost set to ?
>
>
>> Thanks and regards
>>
>>
>>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Avinash Kumar 2020-09-20 13:55:12 Re: Query taking seq scan on a table
Previous Message Avinash Kumar 2020-09-20 13:25:25 Re: Query taking seq scan on a table