From: | Shrikant Bhende <shrikantpostgresql(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Avinash Kumar <avinash(dot)vallarapu(at)gmail(dot)com>, dbatocloud17(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Query taking seq scan on a table |
Date: | 2020-09-20 13:48:22 |
Message-ID: | CAMTQpJCrPLcbw6vmR2i8S6qbXVG3bLioTG7aCBm1JkBHoFtmrw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hello,
show seq_page_cost; 1
show random_page_cost; 4
storage type : SSD
Table size : 39 GB
There are no columns added, also I haven't found anything where we need to
update the data for older rows.
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 6:55 PM Avinash Kumar <avinash(dot)vallarapu(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun., Sep. 20, 2020, 10:19 a.m. Shrikant Bhende, <
> shrikantpostgresql(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am facing issues with one of the queries running on* Amazon Aurora (PG
>> VERSION 9.6)* which is taking more than a minute to complete. As per the
>> initial investigation I assume that one part of the query is taking a
>> sequential scan on a table("wldbowner.member") which is consuming most of
>> the execution time. I tried to use index (Btree and GIN ) as well but none
>> of them were helping to get the query to run faster. Attached is the query
>> along with the explain analyze of the same, any help on the same would be
>> appreciated.
>>
>> NOTE : I have done the vacuum on the table already to get rid of bloat
>> issues.
>> Reindex and test with more work mem is also helping.
>>
> Just wanted to clarify one thing before looking at the query.
>
> What is random_page_cost set to ?
>
>
>> Thanks and regards
>>
>>
>>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Avinash Kumar | 2020-09-20 13:55:12 | Re: Query taking seq scan on a table |
Previous Message | Avinash Kumar | 2020-09-20 13:25:25 | Re: Query taking seq scan on a table |