Re: Should rolpassword be toastable?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should rolpassword be toastable?
Date: 2024-10-06 09:42:53
Message-ID: CAMT0RQTxitznA5Euf_dB-TyNcJAH=+FbGkYco6Wa3ERM1OxEVA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 4:48 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
..
> Since BLCKSZ can be as low as 1024, I think 512 would be a good choice.
>

Where did you get the minimal value of 1024 from ?

I vaguely remember someone testing with 256 at some point in the past

---
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2024-10-06 11:25:38 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-06 09:35:16 Re: [BUG FIX]Connection fails with whitespace after keepalives parameter value