Re: question regarding policy for patches to out-of-support branches

From: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: question regarding policy for patches to out-of-support branches
Date: 2024-06-06 08:25:26
Message-ID: CAMT0RQSB2aqXm_9sJMu-hasZTcGigwN=E1Zv2F8DEQkWmc6jtw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 8:29 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> > I was having a discussion regarding out-of-support branches and effort
> > to keep them building, but could not for the life of me find any actual
> > documented policy (although I distinctly remember that we do something...).
> > Is the policy written down somewhere, or is it only project lore? In
> > either case, what is the actual policy?
>
> I believe our policy was set in this thread:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2923349.1634942313%40sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> and you're right that it hasn't really been memorialized anywhere
> else. I'm not sure where would be appropriate.

Not absolutely sure, but would at least adding a page to PostgreSQL
Wiki about this make sense ?

---
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wang Cheng 2024-06-06 08:27:14 Proposal: Job Scheduler
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2024-06-06 08:21:46 Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows