From: | Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: question regarding policy for patches to out-of-support branches |
Date: | 2024-06-06 08:25:26 |
Message-ID: | CAMT0RQSB2aqXm_9sJMu-hasZTcGigwN=E1Zv2F8DEQkWmc6jtw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 8:29 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> > I was having a discussion regarding out-of-support branches and effort
> > to keep them building, but could not for the life of me find any actual
> > documented policy (although I distinctly remember that we do something...).
> > Is the policy written down somewhere, or is it only project lore? In
> > either case, what is the actual policy?
>
> I believe our policy was set in this thread:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2923349.1634942313%40sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> and you're right that it hasn't really been memorialized anywhere
> else. I'm not sure where would be appropriate.
Not absolutely sure, but would at least adding a page to PostgreSQL
Wiki about this make sense ?
---
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wang Cheng | 2024-06-06 08:27:14 | Proposal: Job Scheduler |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2024-06-06 08:21:46 | Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows |