From: | Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Process initialization labyrinth |
Date: | 2021-04-02 17:31:10 |
Message-ID: | CAMN686HDwhep+mmbTAOC+yB_LK1gHyDtS5sG-oHjG4fFDd3aFw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 1:02 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-04-02 10:18:20 -0400, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
> > I can't really speak to the initial points directly relating to
> > pgstat/shmem, but for the overall maze-like nature of the startup
> > code: is there any chance the startup centralization patchset would be
> > of any help here?
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMN686FE0OdZKp9YPO=htC6LnA6aW4r-+jq=3Q5RAoFQgW8EtA(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
>
> I think parts of it could help, at least. It doesn't really do much
> about centralizing / de-mazing the actual initialization of sub-systems,
> but it'd make it a bit easier to do so.
The patchset needs some work, no doubt. If you think it'd be useful, I
can spend some of my free time addressing any gaps in the design. I'd
hate to see that code go to waste, as I think it may have been a
reasonable first step.
Also not opposed to you taking the patchset and running with it if you prefer.
Thanks,
--
Mike Palmiotto
https://crunchydata.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2021-04-02 17:53:31 | Re: documentation fix for SET ROLE |
Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2021-04-02 17:29:38 | Re: Parallel Full Hash Join |