From: | Rene Saarsoo <nene(at)triin(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SEQUENCE NAME syntax not documented for ALTER TABLE |
Date: | 2025-03-23 16:25:17 |
Message-ID: | CAMHv0CuK7+BaR=gimvCcw_9pRS+9eoxi8pTFvmz5wBq1OCyKNw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 at 17:31, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Where do you see a pointer to CREATE SEQUENCE on that page?
Sorry, my mistake. The page only points to ALTER SEQUENCE.
Now I also see that separate section about ADD GENERATED etc,
which I completely missed earlier. I was searching for a definition of
*sequence_options* which is nowhere to be found on that page.
So I searched for the next best thing sequence_option (in singular)
and found the SET sequence_option section. I expected the definition
of sequence_options to just be the plural of sequence_option.
But confusingly it's not.
I personally would really prefer if this information was part of the main
syntax diagram, not somewhere deep inside the text. But I might be
an odd user of the documentation as I'm trying to write a parser for
PostgreSQL.
Regards,
Rene Saarsoo
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2025-03-25 15:58:31 | Documentation for initdb option --waldir |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-03-23 15:31:37 | Re: SEQUENCE NAME syntax not documented for ALTER TABLE |