| From: | "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <ads(at)pgug(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ravi Krishna <srkrishna1(at)comcast(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgeu-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inherited an 18TB DB & need to backup |
| Date: | 2020-05-15 17:33:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAMDzVO_62netNvu6OzNvKB8Rcr7hm9jDKYbJ65rtanDdu9JSug@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgeu-general pgsql-general |
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:49 PM Ravi Krishna <srkrishna1(at)comcast(dot)net> wrote:
> IMO a database of this size should only be backed up in s3. pgbackrest
> has support for backup to s3.
>
Why should the backup land in S3, and not local somewhere?
Any good reason why one should pay for the additional storage and transfer
costs?
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group
European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of Directors
Volunteer Regional Contact, Germany - PostgreSQL Project
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ravi Krishna | 2020-05-15 17:51:37 | Re: Inherited an 18TB DB & need to backup |
| Previous Message | Suhail Bamzena | 2020-05-15 15:32:20 | Re: Inherited an 18TB DB & need to backup |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ravi Krishna | 2020-05-15 17:51:37 | Re: Inherited an 18TB DB & need to backup |
| Previous Message | John W Higgins | 2020-05-15 16:56:04 | Re: Bug on version 12 ? |