From: | David Gauthier <davegauthierpg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ned to understand why all the idle connections |
Date: | 2020-04-23 18:51:52 |
Message-ID: | CAMBRECB5-esarfYg5+TJd=k-XtBU3aeY=P2sCKEv3hNNQmu6Jg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks!
And an example of connection pooling is pgBouncer ?
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:41 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thursday, April 23, 2020, David Gauthier <davegauthierpg(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>>
>> psql (9.6.7, server 11.3) on linux
>>
>> I have what appear to be a log of idle connections to my DB. Query of
>> pg_stat_activity indicates well over half (127/206) are like this...
>>
>>
>> dvdb=# select state_change,wait_event_type,wait_event,state,backend_type
>> from pg_stat_activity where query = '';
>> state_change | wait_event_type | wait_event |
>> state | backend_type
>>
>> -------------------------------+-----------------+---------------------+-------+------------------------------
>> 2020-04-23 12:57:58.215854-04 | Client | ClientRead |
>> idle | client backend
>>
>> What does this indicate?
>>
>> The vast majority of the connections are through perl/dbi. If a
>> connection is made, and is currently not doing anything, does it appear in
>> pg_stat_activity as "idle" ? If, in DBI, $dbh->disconnect is used whenever
>> the DB is no longer needed, will it disconnect from the DB and NOT appear
>> as an idle in pg_stat_activity ?
>>
>> If there are any other column s in pg_stat-activity you'd like to see, or
>> any other query in any of the system tables, please advise.
>>
>
> If the server has an active, authenticated, connection/process running it
> shows up here. Yes, idle is the state used to denote the the session is
> “not doing anything”...
>
> $dbh->disconnect typically will indeed close the connection. There can be
> exceptions if your architecture uses connection pooling.
>
> David J.
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-04-23 18:55:47 | Re: Could Not Connect To Server |
Previous Message | Dummy Account | 2020-04-23 18:48:35 | Re: Could Not Connect To Server |