Re: Question about VACUUM

no problem Scott, thanks for your appreciations

2011/12/5 Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Ernesto Quiñones <ernestoq(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> vacuum_cost_delay       1s
>>> vacuum_cost_limit       200
>>
>> Those are insane settings for vacuum costing, even on a very slow
>> machine.  Basically you're starving vacuum and autovacuum so much that
>> they can never keep up.
>
> sorry, the word I meant there was pathological.  No insult intended.

--
----------------------------------------------------------
Visita : http://www.eqsoft.net
----------------------------------------------------------
Sigueme en Twitter : http://www.twitter.com/ernestoq