| From: | Sergey Sargsyan <sergey(dot)sargsyan(dot)2001(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Ilya Gladyshev <ilya(dot)v(dot)gladyshev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned index |
| Date: | 2024-10-25 18:32:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAMAof68rdcACQN=ehsAp1yVKVu-Cb_t5aRVDX5jHmVUk41i+ZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I noticed that development on the concurrent index creation for partitioned
tables feature seemed to stall a few months ago. The patch looked solid,
and there didn’t seem to be any issues with it. Has there been any further
progress? This feature would be invaluable, given the prevalence of
partitioned tables in modern databases.
Thanks for any updates!
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 at 9:14 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 11:17:25PM +0100, Ilya Gladyshev wrote:
> > Sure, created a separate thread [1]. Please disregard the second patch in
> > this thread. Duplicating the last version of the relevant patch here to
> > avoid any confusion.
> >
> > [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b72f2d89-820a-4fa2-9058-b155cf646f4f%40gmail.com
>
> Thanks, will check that.
> --
> Michael
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-10-25 19:21:54 | Re: Alias of VALUES RTE in explain plan |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2024-10-25 18:22:07 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |