From: | Aditya Toshniwal <aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Khushboo Vashi <khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]- Feature #7012 - disable master password requirement when using alternative auth source |
Date: | 2022-04-22 10:31:02 |
Message-ID: | CAM9w-_=jjCsRXOOdXXEE1Snw=u1fYAPBTSRUj_K8zZHkHqiJ0w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 3:57 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 11:16, Aditya Toshniwal <
> aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 3:28 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 10:49, Aditya Toshniwal <
>>> aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>
>>>> Generally, secure keys like API_KEYS and all are supposed to be set in
>>>> env and are read by the app. Similar is the alternative encryption key.
>>>> People can run their scripts to export those config vars.
>>>>
>>>
>>> On the client side, yes. This is server side though. It's not uncommon
>>> on the server side to include hooks to allow key retrieval from external
>>> key management systems.
>>>
>> Even on the server side. Like the AWS auth keys, or DB passwords. We can
>> include hooks, not against it. Just discussing.
>>
>
> If you're using an AWS auth key on a server, then you're acting as a
> client for AWS - and DB passwords are a great example of why using a hook
> is a good thing; it's a very common request from users to have a secure way
> to retrieve credentials from an external service. Not to mention that a DB
> password is needed on the client side of a connection, not on the server
> side. On the server side, the database would query LDAP/Kerberos/whatever.
>
> A better example would be querying a key management service to unlock an
> encrypted disk or something like the service Bruce wrote for managing
> pgcrypto keys.
>
Got it. Thanks.
>
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 2:38 PM Khushboo Vashi <
>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 2:34 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 09:57, Khushboo Vashi <
>>>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 2:01 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 at 09:20, Akshay Joshi <
>>>>>>>> akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks, the patch applied.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 12:00 PM Khushboo Vashi <
>>>>>>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please find the attached patch to implement the feature #7012 -
>>>>>>>>>> Disable master password requirement when using alternative auth source
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When pgAdmin stores a connection password, it encrypts it using a
>>>>>>>>>> key that is formed either from the master password, or from the pgAdmin
>>>>>>>>>> login password for the user. In the case of auth methods such as OAuth,
>>>>>>>>>> Kerberos or Webserver, pgAdmin doesn't have access to anything long-lived
>>>>>>>>>> to form the encryption key from, hence it uses the master password. And if
>>>>>>>>>> the master is disabled, there is no way to store the connection password.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To resolve this, we have added an option to config.py (which
>>>>>>>>>> defaults to None) for an alternate encryption key. pgAdmin would use this
>>>>>>>>>> if a) the master password is disabled AND b) there is no suitable
>>>>>>>>>> key/password available from the auth module for the user. If the
>>>>>>>>>> option is set to None, pgAdmin works as it does now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This change has just been brought to my attention through other
>>>>>>>> work. I think this is poorly thought out, and could easily be made much
>>>>>>>> more secure and flexible than the current design.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Instead of effectively hard-coding a master password, which is only
>>>>>>>> slightly more secure than not having one in the first place, we should
>>>>>>>> allow the user to specify the path to a script or program that will return
>>>>>>>> a key. In a security-conscious environment, the script might query a
>>>>>>>> centralised key management system to securely retrieve the key to use. If a
>>>>>>>> user really wants the less secure implementation that this current patch
>>>>>>>> offers, then a simple script as follows would offer that (but would not be
>>>>>>>> recommended):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ====
>>>>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> echo "my secret key"
>>>>>>>> ====
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We would probably also want to allow use of a placeholder in which
>>>>>>>> the username can be passed, e.g.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> MASTER_ENCRYPTION_KEY_SCRIPT = '/path/to/get-key.sh %u'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me.
>>>>>>> Does this mean we are going to remove the current implementation
>>>>>>> which offers a hard-coded master password?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, I think that is the way to go. I don't want to add a config
>>>>>> parameter that doesn't seem like a good solution, and then remove it again
>>>>>> in the next release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, In that case, we need to revert the patch and also need to update
>>>>> the RM #7012 regarding our proposal.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>> Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Aditya Toshniwal
>>>> pgAdmin Hacker | Software Architect | *edbpostgres.com*
>>>> <http://edbpostgres.com>
>>>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Page
>>> Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>
>>> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Aditya Toshniwal
>> pgAdmin Hacker | Software Architect | *edbpostgres.com*
>> <http://edbpostgres.com>
>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
>>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>
--
Thanks,
Aditya Toshniwal
pgAdmin Hacker | Software Architect | *edbpostgres.com*
<http://edbpostgres.com>
"Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aditya Toshniwal | 2022-04-22 12:31:49 | Re: [pgAdmin][RM6131] Port query tool to React |
Previous Message | Akshay Joshi | 2022-04-22 10:29:58 | Re: [pgAdmin][RM7322] Error Message displayed "Request failed with status code 503" if create new database on Windows only |