From: | Robert Klemme <shortcutter(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Li Jin <ljin(at)tripadvisor(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Performance penalty when using WITH |
Date: | 2011-08-03 07:18:12 |
Message-ID: | CAM9pMnMmqpMyMBvp8RPocevcYED89tWxL0LfrjYrnzPOOyvQCw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Robert Klemme
> <shortcutter(at)googlemail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Li Jin <ljin(at)tripadvisor(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I met with the problem that when I was using WITH clause to reuse a
>>> subquery, I got a huge performance penalty because of query planner.
>>> Here are the details, the original query is
>>> EXPLAIN ANALYZE WITH latest_identities AS
>>> (
>>> SELECT DISTINCT ON (memberid) memberid, username, changedate
>>> FROM t_username_history
>>> WHERE memberid IN (SELECT memberid FROM t_member WHERE firstname || ' '
>>> || substring(lastname,1,1) = 'Eddie T')
>>> ORDER BY memberid, changedate DESC
>>> )
>>
>> Another observation: That criterion looks suspicious to me. I would
>> expect any RDBMS to be better able to optimize this:
>>
>> WHERE firstname = 'Eddie' AND lastname like 'T%'
>>
>> I know it's semantically not the same but I would assume this is good
>> enough for the common usecase. Plus, if there is an index on
>> (firstname, lastname) then that could be used.
>
> disagree. just one of the ways that could be stymied would to change
> the function behind the '||' operator.
I don't understand what you mean. Can you please elaborate?
To explain my point a bit: I meant that by querying individual fields
separately instead of applying a criterion on a function of the two
the RDBMS has a better chance to use indexes and come up with a better
plan for this part of the query.
Kind regards
robert
--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sumeet Jauhar | 2011-08-03 07:35:29 | Suspected Postgres Datacorruption |
Previous Message | lars hofhansl | 2011-08-03 00:16:26 | Re: Which Join is better |