| From: | Ondrej Ivanič <ondrej(dot)ivanic(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com>, Geert Mak <pobox(at)verysmall(dot)org>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "Too far out of the mainstream" |
| Date: | 2012-09-05 04:06:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAM6mieLOyGWv443Bt2_8QgB_UetYMKSew5+rCwMdh_Q+sK_Vpg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
On 5 September 2012 12:14, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So people are using PostgreSQL in roles that aren't very visible anyway,
> DBA's are usually coming to PostgreSQL from other RDBMS's, and few
> applications are really distributed for PostgreSQL.
> <snip>
> Not only
> this but there was significant interest in moving more db's to PostgreSQL,
> but the big limitation is that everyone who knows PostgreSQL already has a
> job.
Some shops are going opposite way -- from PostgreSQL to MySQL like
databases because of missing replication features. The 9.1 caught up
but there is no multi-master replication like in Percona's XtraDB
cluster: http://www.percona.com/software/percona-xtradb-cluster/
Postgres-XC can solve this missing multi-master replication issue but
"nobody" knows that this project exists. Another project is "Galera
Cluster for PostgreSQL" (Galera is used in XtraDB) but this looks like
vaporware...
--
Ondrej Ivanic
(ondrej(dot)ivanic(at)gmail(dot)com)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2012-09-05 05:21:24 | Re: Are there any options to parallelize queries? |
| Previous Message | Aleksey Tsalolikhin | 2012-09-05 02:25:38 | Re: postgres process got stuck in "notify interrupt waiting" status |