From: | Ondrej Ivanič <ondrej(dot)ivanic(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | srobertjames(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Rules of Thumb for Autovaccum |
Date: | 2012-02-16 00:25:43 |
Message-ID: | CAM6mieLKsbBx6EJTBksdkm1pAng1Y3BuH25x46v24hTXRdB+iQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
On 16 February 2012 01:14, Robert James <srobertjames(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> What rules of thumb exist for:
> * How often a table needs to be vacuumed?
> * How often a table needs to be analyzed?
> * How to tune Autovacuum?
I prefer to use autovacuum daemon and sets thresholds on per table
basis i.e. sets reasonable defaults and then add few exceptions.
I keep *_threshold as is and change *_scale_factor and turn off cost
based vacuum/analyse (see other note about this). My lowest
scale_factor is 0.002 ie. 0.2% of table has to change (which
corresponds to ~8mil rows) to trigger analyse/vacuum.
autovacuum/analyse can produce significant I/O so you have two options:
- tune cost based settings in order to limit I/O used by this porocess
- turn off autovacuum daemon and schedule manual acuum/analyse in quiet period
--
Ondrej Ivanic
(ondrej(dot)ivanic(at)gmail(dot)com)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kiriakos Georgiou | 2012-02-16 02:08:34 | order of evaluation of search arguments |
Previous Message | Stefan Keller | 2012-02-15 21:37:08 | Re: [postgis-users] ST_AsJpeg |