From: | Raúl Marín Rodríguez <rmrodriguez(at)carto(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench |
Date: | 2017-12-01 11:11:38 |
Message-ID: | CAM6_UM64Lq2sbacu6wx6ngr73-tTHVwS4vWFE22o3Fj3B00vNg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Fabien,
The idea is that it would be relative to the "more functions and operators"
> patch, but I guess this is too much for people checking, so I'm fine with
> having it with the current base.
>
I tried applying the last "more functions and operators" patch
(pgbench-more-ops-funcs-14.patch) but it also stopped applying cleanly so I
decided to go for master to avoid having too many issues. Let me know if
you rework that patch and I'll be happy to rebase mine on top.
--
*Raúl Marín Rodríguez *carto.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Beena Emerson | 2017-12-01 11:20:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-12-01 10:44:47 | Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench |