Re: PoC: Partial sort

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PoC: Partial sort
Date: 2016-02-15 19:47:12
Message-ID: CAM3SWZToVr8oZhth-6roK6CGr1wO8z3ip2F20UPsdokx_d0DBg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Great to have a new version -- there seems to be a lot of interest in
> this patch. I'm moving this one to the next commitfest, thanks.

I am signed up to review this patch.

I was very surprised to see it in "Needs Review" state in the CF app
(Alexander just rebased the patch, and didn't do anything with the CF
app entry). Once again, this seems to have happened just because
Alvaro moved the patch to the next CF.

I've marked it "Waiting on Author" once more. Hopefully the CF app
will be fixed soon, so moving a patch to the next commitfest no longer
clobbers its state.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2016-02-15 20:15:08 Re: Declarative partitioning
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-02-15 19:26:59 Re: Remove or weaken hints about "effective resolution of sleep delays is 10 ms"?