Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little
Date: 2015-12-18 21:28:59
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTPTG6eneGn8iuny-CX9L5CLTTXPsB70qUSQSz1Y9bN4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> It isn't true that Heikki was not basically in favor of this. This
>> should have been committed as part of the original patch, really.
>
> Maybe he wasn't against the whole thing, but he's posted two messages
> to this thread and they can't be read as unequivocally in favor of
> these changes. He clearly didn't like at least some of it.

The issues were very trivial.

> I only see one patch version on the thread.

I'm not going to post a revision until I thrash out the tiny issues
with Heikki. He kind of trailed off. So maybe that kills it
immediately, which is a shame.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2015-12-18 21:56:24 Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions
Previous Message Andreas Seltenreich 2015-12-18 21:23:13 [sqlsmith] Failing assertions in spgtextproc.c