| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} |
| Date: | 2014-12-23 19:34:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZTNTNyfh2V_osGYJ1U_kppV036LP5Ls9Y+6fJ42gMbSow@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> I tend to agree. I think we should just live with the fact that not
> every conceivable use case will be covered, at least initially.
To be clear: I still think I should go and make the changes that will
make the feature play nice with all shipped non-default B-Tree
operator classes, and will make it work with partial unique indexes
[1]. That isn't difficult or controversial, AFAICT, and gets us very
close to satisfying every conceivable use case.
[1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM3SWZQdv7GDLwPRv7=rE-gG1QjLOOL3vCmAriCBcTYk8GwqKw@mail.gmail.com
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2014-12-23 19:36:18 | Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-12-23 19:30:16 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} |