| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Tan Tran <tankimtran(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| Date: | 2014-04-30 18:03:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZTN=MihNtfwt-MgEkcUeJyREzWMsn2LGLRcjs4ZdBR=ZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-students |
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It might lead to good things later; and even if
> it doesn't, the lack of WAL support is an embarrassment.
I don't think it will, but I do agree that the current state of
affairs is an embarrassment.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-04-30 18:10:22 | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-04-30 18:02:56 | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-04-30 18:10:22 | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-04-30 18:02:56 | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-04-30 18:10:22 | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-04-30 18:02:56 | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |