| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues |
| Date: | 2015-04-28 16:45:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZT9u4BEbCyYjSRZJKEu3WWvk_T3yzYqR4ccD61O_KpUWg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I agree with that, but how are NEW and OLD ambiguous? NEW is clearly
> the tuple being added, while OLD is clearly the existing tuple.
Yes, but EXCLUDED is neither the tuple being added, nor is it the new
tuple. It's something else entirely.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2015-04-28 16:47:08 | Re: [PATCH] Add transforms feature |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-04-28 16:42:54 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues |