| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: json(b) equality rules |
| Date: | 2014-04-03 15:20:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZT99O5jR8P1VK6gVxe7nQ_yZiAimrBcJSRqc_PtB5kAAg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I don't think we should follow these rules at all. Json is not Javascript,
> and these are Javascript rules, not Json rules. I'm entirely opposed to
> treating 0, "0", false, and [0] as equal. The equality rule we actually have
> for jsonb is the correct one, I believe.
+1
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-04-03 15:28:34 | Re: jsonb is also breaking the rule against nameless unions |
| Previous Message | Mike Blackwell | 2014-04-03 14:39:52 | Re: BUG #9518: temporary login failure - "missing pg_hba entry" |