| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New CF app deployment |
| Date: | 2015-01-26 20:13:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZT5YgaoWW7zJe8bL4iq2AOMsLRtb+apqxpQFKJEcHaQjg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> There's a fairly serious readability problem when someone has posted a
> patch as a subthread of some more general discussion. For example, look
> at the "adaptive ndistinct estimator" patch: it's not obvious which
> attachment is the actual patch, and whether the latest email has
> anything to do with the patch is entirely arbitrary.
I think that the inability to put each message in context, with
"metadata" comments associated with individual messages is a serious
regression in functionality. I hope it is fixed soon. I raised this
issue at the earliest opportunity, when Magnus privately sought
feedback early last year.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-01-26 20:20:27 | Re: New CF app deployment |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-01-26 19:21:13 | Re: Windows buildfarm animals are still not happy with abbreviated keys patch |