Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort (was: Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization))

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort (was: Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization))
Date: 2015-01-25 02:37:18
Message-ID: CAM3SWZT1KL1sswN6encnTO=KgGObekCLcvHMMyKr119jwNzppA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think this is a good idea. Do you have a test case that shows the benefit?

I agree. It seems likely that this will show a similar benefit to
other cases already tested, but I'd like to see a test case too.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-01-25 03:04:01 Re: pg_upgrade and rsync
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-01-25 02:19:48 Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort (was: Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization))