Re: Re: Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates
Date: 2015-12-09 22:23:11
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSuW5e+tzVZvKP-Eo-9v2TW57MmfyA+vR1s9-Htzb0FYg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> I think that you're missing that patch 0001 formally forbids
> abbreviated keys that are pass-by-value

Sorry. I do of course mean it forbids abbreviated keys that are *not*
pass-by-value (that are pass-by-reference).

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eric Ridge 2015-12-09 22:35:40 Given a view relation OID, how to construct a Query?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-12-09 22:18:55 Re: [sqlsmith] Failed to generate plan on lateral subqueries