Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases
Date: 2016-04-15 00:02:49
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSmMZm-52R5LSBBNgUQ_HLACZwfK4xazdce2qyrGHPe7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> * We should look into using the ucol_nextSortKeyPart() API:
>
> http://userguide.icu-project.org/collation/architecture#TOC-Partial-sort-keys

Another more rich API we could immediately put to good use is the ICU
strcoll() variant that does not require NUL-terminated strings:

https://ssl.icu-project.org/apiref/icu4c/ucol_8h.html#a3abc6779e6452106415918199308fab4

We do not use a NUL byte for terminating text data, and so must copy
its contents into a temp buffer, or array on the stack, all rather
inefficiently. Robert has expressed an interest in an API like this
strcoll() variant in the past [1], to avoid this unnecessary overhead.

[1] http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2012/03/perils-of-collation-aware-comparisons.html
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2016-04-15 00:57:11 Disallow unique index on system columns
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-04-14 23:42:15 Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases