Re: Documentation of bt_page_items()'s ctid field

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation of bt_page_items()'s ctid field
Date: 2015-03-11 22:57:48
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSk-MYEXzqKdwQfBV2c=sX6Sn_La7mXgnhpcC2V41JH+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'd mark it ready for committer, but since I also attached a suggested
> replacement patch it seems presumptuous to do that.

I've marked it "ready for committer". I think your version is slightly better.

Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-03-11 23:38:11 Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2015-03-11 22:22:24 Re: procost for to_tsvector