| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: autovacuum_work_mem |
| Date: | 2013-12-11 19:34:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZSZCqCEeMajbQ3eJgT=7wexhhc6d3LH7bZhNme6sT+4TA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> That's about 2-3 days work and I know Peter can hack it. So the
> situation is not perfection-sought-blocking-good, this is more like
> fairly poor solution being driven through when a better solution is
> available within the time and skills available.
I think that that's a very optimistic assessment of the amount of work
required. Even by the rose-tinted standards of software project time
estimation. A ton of data is required to justify fundamental
infrastructural changes like that.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-12-11 19:37:07 | Re: -d option for pg_isready is broken |
| Previous Message | Gavin Flower | 2013-12-11 19:33:08 | Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good |