Re: pg_class.relpages/allvisible probably shouldn't be a int4

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_class.relpages/allvisible probably shouldn't be a int4
Date: 2014-05-11 06:21:34
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSXYNxyL6o6P2H3-h=V7D7iVd49XtEU8SjjLfEywjZL6A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> And adding a proper unsigned type doesn't sound like a small amount of work.

Perhaps not, but it's overdue. We ought to have one.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sameer Thakur 2014-05-11 08:17:02 Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-05-11 05:37:55 Re: 9.5: UPDATE/DELETE .. ORDER BY .. LIMIT ..