| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes) |
| Date: | 2013-06-27 07:10:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZSOpDqL2KrE3RxujmVb9JF8V_xs6hmuzkd3gsDEOHh6Qg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure what the resolution of Alvaro's concern was, so I left the
>> flag reporting the same as the previous patch.
>
> Alvaro's concern was that the new flags added (those added by the
> foreign key locks patch) do something cute with re-using multiple
> other bits in an otherwise nonsensical combination to represent a
> distinct state.
I just realized that it wasn't that you didn't understand the nature
of the problem, but that you weren't sure of a resolution. Sorry for
the noise.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2013-06-27 07:12:07 | Re: refresh materialized view concurrently |
| Previous Message | Yuri Levinsky | 2013-06-27 07:08:08 | Re: Hash partitioning. |