Re: KNN-GiST with recheck

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: KNN-GiST with recheck
Date: 2014-11-21 23:20:56
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSMdDZnLUs_AoHabDVndRjtJPVLQJk04Bjtr24Wu6Nv4w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This patch was split from thread:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPpHfdscOX5an71nHd8WSUH6GNOCf=V7wgDaTXdDd9=goN-gfA@mail.gmail.com
>
> I've split it to separate thead, because it's related to partial sort only
> conceptually not technically. Also I renamed it to "knn-gist-recheck" from
> "partial-knn" as more appropriate name. In the attached version docs are
> updated. Possible weak point of this patch design is that it fetches heap
> tuple from GiST scan. However, I didn't receive any notes about its design,
> so, I'm going to put it to commitfest.

The partial sort thing is not in the current 2014-10 commitfest
(although this patch is). Is that intentional?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-11-21 23:36:52 Re: Should the removal of SnapshotNow be in the compatibility warnings for 9.4?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-11-21 23:14:08 Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API