From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: KNN-GiST with recheck |
Date: | 2014-11-21 23:20:56 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZSMdDZnLUs_AoHabDVndRjtJPVLQJk04Bjtr24Wu6Nv4w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This patch was split from thread:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPpHfdscOX5an71nHd8WSUH6GNOCf=V7wgDaTXdDd9=goN-gfA@mail.gmail.com
>
> I've split it to separate thead, because it's related to partial sort only
> conceptually not technically. Also I renamed it to "knn-gist-recheck" from
> "partial-knn" as more appropriate name. In the attached version docs are
> updated. Possible weak point of this patch design is that it fetches heap
> tuple from GiST scan. However, I didn't receive any notes about its design,
> so, I'm going to put it to commitfest.
The partial sort thing is not in the current 2014-10 commitfest
(although this patch is). Is that intentional?
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-11-21 23:36:52 | Re: Should the removal of SnapshotNow be in the compatibility warnings for 9.4? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-11-21 23:14:08 | Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API |