Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition - v0.2

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition - v0.2
Date: 2014-01-29 05:27:29
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSMYKkrzY6yOmCDEnLxN4+ogELU_mO+TeAxfJkymi_8yw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> 1) I've added an abstracted atomic ops implementation. Needs a fair
> amount of work, also submitted as a separate CF entry. (Patch 1 & 2)

Commit 220b34331f77effdb46798ddd7cca0cffc1b2858 caused bitrot when
applying 0002-Very-basic-atomic-ops-implementation.patch. Please
rebase.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-01-29 05:43:40 Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-01-29 05:26:34 Re: Retain dynamic shared memory segments for postmaster lifetime