Re: local_preload_libraries logspam

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: local_preload_libraries logspam
Date: 2013-05-08 03:25:32
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSCcfxPETw-YftTd9tmwceSrZPMaD0ngvSgmKsXfgxnKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> On the other hand, if we have it as DEBUG2 in the EXEC_BACKEND code
> path, I would be willing to argue that that's too low. If you're
> starting to feel a need to inquire into the backend's behavior, knowing
> about loaded modules seems like one of the first things you need to know
> about. Hence, I'd vote for DEBUG1.

+1 to DEBUG1.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2013-05-08 03:38:44 Re: XLogFlush invoked about twice as many times after 9.2 group commit enhancement
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-05-08 03:18:33 Re: Make targets of doc links used by phpPgAdmin static