From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} |
Date: | 2014-12-05 20:04:01 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZS-pqYo9-ghNgTTa6t-hgby8OgHp4GLeG_zVewRHYJvKw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen
<anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi> wrote:
> If Django is going to use the INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE variant in
> Django for the existing save() method, then it needs to know if the
> result was an UPDATE or INSERT. If we are going to use this for other
> operations (for example bulk merge of rows to the database), it would be
> very convenient to have per-row updated/created information available so
> that we can fire the post_save signals for the rows. If we don't have
> that information available, it means we can't fire signals, and no
> signals means we can't use the bulk merge operation internally as we
> have to fire the signals where that happened before.
>
> Outside of Django there are likely similar reasons to want to know if
> the result of an operation was a creation of a new row. The reason could
> be creation of related row, doing some action in application layer, or
> just UI message telling "object created successfully" vs "object updated
> successfully".
It probably isn't ideal, but you'd at least be able to do something
with row level triggers in the absence of a standard way of directly
telling if an insert or update was performed.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2014-12-05 20:05:57 | Re: On partitioning |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-12-05 20:02:53 | Re: On partitioning |