| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marc-Olaf Jaschke <marc-olaf(dot)jaschke(at)s24(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
| Date: | 2016-03-23 19:07:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZS+6T13wz7XEV2a8q9T5oQzUFOhdLr=A0qTCs0Vyy94qw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think that disabling abbreviation when the C collation is in makes
>> no sense, though.
>
> But the patch doesn't do that, right?
Right, it doesn't. But I was surprised that you even mentioned it as a
possibility. That's all.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-23 19:20:17 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-23 19:04:37 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-23 19:15:54 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.6 behavior change with set returning (funct).* |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-23 19:04:37 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |