Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS
Date: 2015-01-08 01:18:58
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRzht4WM4fjHq23C9C+-WDGJk+-66NX47f33DhttJZnNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:16 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> There's precedent. Unique constraints, for example.

I don't see that as any kind of precedent.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2015-01-08 01:33:43 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS
Previous Message David Fetter 2015-01-08 01:16:31 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS