Re: Trustly PostgreSQL Data Corruption Bug Bounty Program

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Trustly PostgreSQL Data Corruption Bug Bounty Program
Date: 2015-06-24 19:15:35
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRutWD2Kydn39535jXXGsKD-c2K-yio2EMSpQ-Z5uGN6A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks Joel, good idea.

Any scheme that offers incentives for doing the unglamorous work of
writing a corruption test suite for PostgreSQL is good news, IMV. That
seems to be the idea here. I just hope that someone doesn't end up
incentivized to keep those cards close to their chest.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-06-24 19:41:22 Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-06-24 19:13:19 Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?