Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)aiven(dot)io>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Tripp <peter(at)chartio(dot)com>, Virendra Negi <virendra(at)idyllic-software(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple
Date: 2016-07-27 17:19:39
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRqrHoLkHM-7oRL==OiiT_Rb1njQWgw2rURZj7PG-xSEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> At the moment, fixing the bug is blocking on proper review of that
> second revision. I've outlined already that I have a couple of
> non-specific concerns about how it could be buggy, neither of which
> are actionable by Oskari. It needs further scrutiny from other
> hackers, particularly Andres, but looks correct to me.

Any idea of when you'll get around to this, Andres? I don't want to
miss the next point release.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jbristow 2016-07-27 18:17:40 BUG #14266: rhel-6Client yum repository is missing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-07-27 12:48:52 Re: BUG #7808: unnest doesn't handle nulls in array of composite typescorrectly