From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marc-Olaf Jaschke <marc-olaf(dot)jaschke(at)s24(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
Date: | 2016-03-24 19:29:40 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZRodZbhYK=-kVK003pUE8ZknUgni454VWhNg0HrQ5j8+Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The only people that are likely comfortable giving final sign-off on
>> it that are active this CF are Tom and Kevin. That is an awkward
>> situation.
>
> I would not be comfortable with reviewing an entire module with the
> intention of shipping it in a stable branch on Monday, even if I had
> nothing else to do between now and then. I think the only sane way
> to get this into 9.5.2 would be to slip the release date, and that
> seems rather counterproductive. We need to get this fix into the
> hands of users ASAP.
That's fair. I didn't really imagine that we'd want to put the tool
into 9.5 myself. Still, I think that amcheck could have some role to
play in managing the problem. Even the near-term availability of
amcheck for 9.5 as a satellite project would count. That could happen
without blocking the point release. I just don't want to go over
anyone's head with that.
"REINDEX everything" isn't a realistic plan for a lot of users.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-24 19:47:03 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-24 19:20:20 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-24 19:47:03 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-24 19:20:20 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |