From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements |
Date: | 2015-09-22 22:58:51 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZRo_5ZznTp=Mg5Kh2eq-LjWLVS-BXJwsHe_dS50g34Mfw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> At first I thought the lack of context indicated a palloc had failed during
> ereport() (since we apparently just toss the previous error when that
> happens), but it turns out there's some error reporting in
> pg_stat_statements that's less than ideal. Attached patch fixes, though I'm
> not sure if %lld is portable or not.
+ ereport(LOG,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_OUT_OF_MEMORY),
+ errmsg("out of memory attempting to pg_stat_statement file"),
+ errdetail("file \"%s\": size %lld", PGSS_TEXT_FILE,
stat.st_size)));
Uh, what?
I'm not opposed to this basic idea, but I think the message should be
reworded, and that the presence of two separate ereport() call sites
like the above is totally unnecessary. The existing MaxAllocSize check
is just defensive; no user-visible distinction needs to be made.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-09-22 23:24:31 | Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2015-09-22 22:48:38 | Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements |