Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
Date: 2014-09-19 18:05:32
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRkn11o2_3sKtRAk1RmW_F9oN8hEFHNmtuk57gQ0GAxUg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> OK, good point. So committed as-is, then, except that I rewrote the
> comments, which I felt were excessively long for the amount of code.

Thanks!

I look forward to hearing your thoughts on the open issues with the
patch as a whole.
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2014-09-19 18:20:09 Re: Anonymous code block with parameters
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-09-19 18:05:14 Re: removing volatile qualifiers from lwlock.c