Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Date: 2014-11-17 17:06:26
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRkiC5iYR4gfScFVKj3=EJ=0bzOS9dZ+DQggOO1WAPB5w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> * Documentation clean-up - as I mentioned, I tried to address Simon's
> concerns here. Also, as you'd expect, the documentation has been fixed
> up to reflect the new syntax. I'll need to take a pass at updating the
> UPSERT Wiki page soon, too.

I should mention that I've updated the Wiki to reflect the current,
post-v1.4 state of affairs. That remains the best place to get a
relatively quick overview of where things stand with open items,
discussion of the patch, etc:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/UPSERT

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2014-11-17 17:13:09 Re: 9.5: Better memory accounting, towards memory-bounded HashAgg
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-11-17 17:04:55 Re: 9.5: Better memory accounting, towards memory-bounded HashAgg