Re: A Typo in regress/sql/privileges.sql

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tatsuro Yamada <yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A Typo in regress/sql/privileges.sql
Date: 2015-12-22 23:10:29
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRja09j98gCft6ztmtFLe2DvjqNs864vXgO8FhPv6xGyw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If it's an axiom that there is nothing wrong with the term inference,
> then obviously we should not change anything. But that seems to me to
> be putting the cart before the horse.

OK, then. What's wrong with the term inference?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-12-22 23:17:31 Re: Re: Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-12-22 22:59:22 Re: Re: Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates