| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Brightwell, Adam" <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yeb Havinga <yeb(dot)havinga(at)portavita(dot)nl> |
| Subject: | Re: RLS feature has been committed |
| Date: | 2014-09-25 22:11:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZRZk6by+uiyqacRjhxZcNQDSUX8L4b+r6jG7eNWEHUYwA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> A revert wasn't requested by the individual who raised the concern (or,
> indeed, explicitly by *anyone*.. it was hinted at, but I felt the
> individuals who were hinting at it were leaving it up to that individual
> who had a concern), and I discussed it with him extensively and we came
> to what I believe is an understanding. I'm not sure that I understand
> the need to bring it up again, unless you have a concern regarding what
> was committed.
FWIW, I think Heikki's proposal to revisit this in the next commitfest
is fine. I don't think that this is something that needs to be pored
over.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-09-25 22:23:38 | Re: better atomics - v0.6 |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-09-25 22:07:06 | Re: RLS feature has been committed |