Re: jsonb status

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonb status
Date: 2014-03-19 22:57:26
Message-ID: CAM3SWZR9gJYC=mDE7hxKb8qoiJfFqM7E3cTgbDtxvD8Y6JhZcQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> * Jsonb vs JsonbValue is just bad, the latter needs to be renamed, and
> there needs to be a very clear explanation about why two forms exist
> and what each is used for.

I've pushed some comments to Github that further clarify the
distinction: https://github.com/feodor/postgres/commit/5835de0b55bdfc02ee59e2affb6ce25995587dc4

I did not change the name of JsonbValue, because I sincerely could not
think of a better one. The distinction is subtle.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-03-19 23:27:52 Re: Patch to send transaction commit/rollback stats to the stats collector unconditionally.
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2014-03-19 22:31:52 Re: four minor proposals for 9.5