Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids?
Date: 2013-07-09 02:38:07
Message-ID: CAM3SWZR7ppKWZmHUPYP5po=BbpsZ6c9_QAEbu1JBp=D7wi0Q0Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> This would require a rather higher standard of portability than
> duplicate_oids has heretofore been held to.

Ah, yes. I suppose that making this happen would necessitate rewriting
the script in highly portable Perl. Unfortunately, I'm not a likely
candidate for that task.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-07-09 02:44:12 Re: Millisecond-precision connect_timeout for libpq
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2013-07-09 02:25:50 Re: [HACKERS] [9.4 CF] Free VMs for Reviewers & Testers