Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes
Date: 2016-02-08 22:39:03
Message-ID: CAM3SWZR=DwhLozHwve54C7aHVvH5Cnxe5JtV7W5tXWXEOQQcCA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I think having a public git tree, that contains the current state, is
> greatly helpful for that. Just announce that you're going to screw
> wildly with history, and that you're not going to be terribly careful
> about commit messages. That means observers can just do a fetch and a
> reset --hard to see the absolutely latest and greatest. By all means
> post a series to the list every now and then, but I think for minor
> changes it's perfectly sane to say 'pull to see the fixups for the
> issues you noticed'.

I would really like for there to be a way to do that more often. It
would be a significant time saver, because it removes problems with
minor bitrot.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2016-02-08 22:45:01 Re: 2016-01 Commitfest
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-02-08 22:35:38 Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes