| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode |
| Date: | 2015-06-05 21:08:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQvA=+75su3pLemzj1LM6Wcxqbi0RjAABbgDsf+gEcMJA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I do agree that an indefinite development freeze with unclear
> parameters for resuming development and unclear goals is a bad plan.
> But I think giving ourselves a little more time to, say, turn the
> buildfarm consistently green, and, say, fix the known but
> currently-unfixed multixact bugs, and, say, fix the known bugs in 9.5
> features is a good plan, and I hope you and others will support it.
FWIW, I have 3 pending bug fixes for UPSERT. While those are pretty
benign issues, I'd be annoyed if they didn't get into the first 9.5
beta (or alpha, even).
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-06-05 21:38:32 | Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-06-05 20:59:21 | Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |