Re: pg_upgrade 9.6->9.6: column "amtype" does not exist

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade 9.6->9.6: column "amtype" does not exist
Date: 2016-04-01 21:37:19
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQv8HZoTzYxhA6EQKYwQ5CKwHnhd5qwv+aT9cG0fdmCnw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
> I'm not sure this is a bug, but before it bites back too late, I'm
> reporting it now.

This must be a regression from the changes made to the pg_am interface
by commit 65c5fcd353a859da9e61bfb2b92a99f12937de3b.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Rijkers 2016-04-01 21:37:47 Re: pgsql: Bloom index contrib module
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2016-04-01 21:31:20 pg_upgrade 9.6->9.6: column "amtype" does not exist